Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Rock Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: the Chief who wrote (751)	1/28/1999 10:59:00 AM
From: Stew	Respond to of 1996

Thanks very much Chief.

To: the Chief who wrote (751)	1/28/1999 12:18:00 PM
From: L M	Respond to of 1996

Much appreciated. Thank you very much. (eom)

To: the Chief who wrote (751)	1/28/1999 12:35:00 PM
From: Mike Gold	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1996

Great newsletter for ROCK-Chief! Only a couple of comments! It regards to the geology of the property-they could have been a bit more objective instead of following the party line-ie material in the PR package. Still I found the comparison of gold vs. copper mining quite informative. Thought it funny that they thought overburden was an advantage-hmmm! Well I suppose it could be if those veins they are talking about are really good. Or perhaps it leads to the formation of a supergene enrichment zone above the porphyry. Chief, I think you told me this before-but what do you think are the odds that a hydrothermal porphyry target in Chile will, in fact, have an economic grade porphyry deposit-and considering all the evidence to date that has been gathered. Thanks in advance!