Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (30481)	1/29/1999 5:00:00 AM
From: JBL	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<But perhaps you might care to explain why Starr hasn't gone after Jordan?> For the same reason that he hasn't yet indicted, Nathan Landow and Bruce Lindsey. These indicments are stored for the end game, after or during witness testimony, when perjuries become obvious for the whole world to see, and when the players' attention is at its maximum. <Why are they going back to the (almost surely dry) well with Webster Hubbell again?> Why indeed would they be going back to this well if it were dry? <The Inquisitors could have been doing so much more for the cause helping out Henry Hyde and the House Hotheads with Jordan.> The House had enough evidence as it was. The indictment of Jordan would have been spinned as racist or unfair by the HJC Democrats. <Maybe I shouldn't doubt your ironclad logic here, but it looks a bit like neologic to me.> No, neologic is pretending that behavior that would qualify anybody for jail is somehow not impeachable, or that oral sex is not sex, or that Clinton and Lewinsky were never alone. When this White House adopts such ridiculous statements as the basis of its defense, I hope you will forgive my stuborn attitude regarding the belief that Clinton is toast.