SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (30515)1/28/1999 1:13:00 PM
From: one_less  Respond to of 67261
 
<<..prosecutorial good conduct..>>

Now there is one that only seems to be an issue in this case. The guy may be as guilty as anything but if the prosecutors have displayed bad manners, lets forget the whole thing????



To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (30515)1/28/1999 1:19:00 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Democrat senators won't allow criminal court procedures. They won't even stand for witnesses. They even object to being called jurors.



To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (30515)1/28/1999 1:24:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
>Prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Clinton obstructed justice--using criminal court standards of evidence and prosecutorial good conduct--and I believe, as I have said before, you have a solid case for impeachment and removal.<

You make several errors. Firstly, you here limit the judgement only to “obstruction”, which is not Clinton's only crime. Secondly, you attempt to judge Clinton's crimes merely by criminal standards (a thing to be reserved for a criminal court, NOT a court of impeachment).

Some of Clinton's crimes are criminal, yes, and they should be judged by a criminal court; but they are not merely criminal. They are POLITICAL, as described by the Founding Fathers. The subjects of a court of impeachment's jurisdiction are political crimes, namely, those crimes that result in an abuse of some public trust. Therefore, Clinton's impeachment is justified.



To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (30515)1/28/1999 4:50:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Nope. Doesn't work that way. Impeachment and removals are not tried in a Court of law. Criminal procedural rules do not apply. Further a sitting President can not be indicted until he leaves office. Using your logic, you'd have to leave a criminal in the WH until he left office. JLA