Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (30566)	1/28/1999 3:02:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

...and there will be police at many state borders, to prevent people from "escaping" to another state to have an abortion? What a wonderful vision for the future!

To: Neocon who wrote (30566)	1/28/1999 3:08:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Good, you agree with Kristol. Thanks for the clear statement. Do you think the next Republican Presidential candidate should clearly state his intention to appoint SC justices that will likely vote to overturn Roe v. Wade? We know that's likely to be a primary consideration when the next vacancy comes up, as it was when Bush nominated "the best man for the job". Personally, I imagine the issue will be treated much as the impeachment issue was before the Nov. election. If you want, I can point you to a long, mostly polite, but quite absurd debate I had with another conservative about candidates stating their position clearly then.