Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (30579)	1/28/1999 3:35:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

I'd agree that the original decision is perhaps flawed constitutionally. But it's another culture war can of worms. If you want to open it up again, you should be direct and straightforward about it. I'd agree also that a voting commitment from the nominees would be improper, but if it's going to be a litmus test, as I'm sure it was with Thomas, there ought to be at least a smidgen of honesty about it. Politically, overturning Roe v. Wade is a loser by most indications. That's why I expect it will be softpedaled in the Y2K campaign, just as impeachment was, mostly, before the last election.