SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Lloyd who wrote (44853)1/28/1999 5:07:00 PM
From: Tommaso  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
It appears to me that Greenspan's imagination is running away with him. He ended by saying that it was "good for our system."

When I first read the BBC account of what he said, I agreed with your point of view, but when I looked more carefully, I saw that his unwillingness to say anything bad about the great rise in the Internet stocks could be construed as a tacit endorsement as speculation as just part of what was "good for our system."

Here is the CBS version, which quotes things somewhat out of order:

cbs.marketwatch.com

I am looking forward to seeing the entire text somewhere or other.

In his desire not to say anything that could sound discouraging, though, he has seemed to endorse gambling.

Bankers and investment advisors were quite angry over the famous exuberance remark, considering that equity levels were none of his business. Now anything he says has to have a Delphic Oracle ambiguity to it.



To: Don Lloyd who wrote (44853)1/28/1999 5:29:00 PM
From: Tommaso  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 132070
 
Others please excuse if this link is already posted:

dailynews.yahoo.com

If this is the best answer Greenspan can give (and it's on par with some offered during the launching of the South Sea Company), I think it's time he was put out to pasture in some economists' limbo. As a disciple of Ayn Rand, he ought to be able to accept that it's in everyone's rational self-interest.