Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Randy Ellingson who wrote (37463)	1/28/1999 5:08:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph	Respond to of 164684

That said, what do you see for Q1 revenues? I'll take a wild guess and say $287M. Randy, I really have no idea. Let me see if I can tell how many dollars were in gift certificates when the 10K comes out. Glenn

To: Randy Ellingson who wrote (37463)	1/29/1999 9:00:00 PM
From: llamaphlegm	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

did not listen again but I believe the comment was more of a guess rather than a matter of fact. It was Covey that said she believed they "could" show a seqential increase in revenue from Q4 98 to Q1 99. The analysts than made it sound like a fact. I didn't listen again either, but my take was that the statement was not hedged at all -- i.e., that they do expect 99Q1/98Q4 revenues > Uh, am i the only one who thinks that they could do this pretty easily by just "buying" more revenues with their stock and newly bloated cash coffers ... hmmmm dlj, csfb and msdw lead the issue -- what a coincidence