Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rico Staris who wrote (17451)	1/28/1999 6:03:00 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

Heh, that says a lot. For CLST you can actually formulate words like 'revenue'—you know, something about the company. Truly amazing. Not much to say about this one, though—except 'diapers', eh? In a roundabout way, I guess we're actually in complete agreement. <gg>

To: Rico Staris who wrote (17451)	1/28/1999 8:46:00 PM
From: Don Pueblo	Respond to of 26163

2 BILLION DOLLARS IN TOTAL REVENUE NOW That is most impressive. That would probably qualify the stock for a listing on the NASD. Assuming an average wholesale price of a hundred bucks per stoned bird, that would be roughly 20,000,000 birds sold. I think it would take a carver about 2 hours to carve one and assemble it, so that would be, say, 4 birds per day. 25,000 carvers could make 100,000 birds a day, so if they worked about 200 days a year, you would get about 20,000,000 birds a year. Assuming you made a hundred bucks on each one, that's 2 Extremely Large! So, one bird per day on EBay, that would deplete the inventory around the time the Sun burns out, am I correct? Wait, I forgot to figure in the cost of feeding 25,000 natives. Oh, wait, I forgot the cost of the raw materials. Maybe it only takes one hour to carve and assemble one bird. That would reduce the work force to only 12,500. Yeah, I think that would for sure help this company qualify for the NASD. That's a large factory. Where is it again? Wait! You said revenues! Not earnings! OK, I got it now. Can you help me out here? I'm confused.

To: Rico Staris who wrote (17451)	1/28/1999 9:11:00 PM
From: Don Pueblo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

Yes, I just checked, and those revenues would put AZNT ahead of ASND in the revenues department. I really think a NASD listing would be the way to go here. BTW, was that the Purple Microdot or the Owlsley Blue that you swallowed? BAWK!

To: Rico Staris who wrote (17451)	2/8/1999 7:05:00 PM
From: Charles L. Solomont, Esq., Bin	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 26163

Reference is made to my post to you of December 10, 1998, to which you failed to respond. Please be advised that, on behalf of Michael Zwebner, we have issued a subpoena on Silicon Investor (“SI”) commanding SI to disclose your true identities. Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as a result of your failure to waive service of a judicial summons upon you, the court will impose upon you all costs incurred by Mr. Zwebner to effect service of the summons. The expense of subpoenaing Silicon Investor will be included among the costs you will be required to pay. You may avoid liability for further costs by returning the waiver of service form to my attention forthwith. Otherwise, formal judicial notice will be served upon you personally, and you shall bear the full cost of effecting same. Very truly yours, Charles L. Solomont Bingham Dana LLP 150 Federal Street Boston, MA 02110