Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Market Gems:Stocks w/Strong Earnings and High Tech. Rank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: j g cordes who wrote (23485)	1/28/1999 11:30:00 PM
From: Mr.Manners	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 120523

There is NO downside to freely discussing picks and ideas by all. Jim, you bet there is... why pay for picks that are posted for free.... and I did not mention 1,000 subscribers as though that were some magic number if Jenna had 10 subscribers that would be great too as for 86,000 SI members.. I don't care .. if a stock is going to move I want it to do so based on informed reality, not somebody catching the fever from a quick perusal of a few posts K.com <g>

To: j g cordes who wrote (23485)	1/28/1999 11:32:00 PM
From: Alan Smithee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 120523

There is NO downside to freely discussing picks and ideas by all. Nor do any subscribers loose a nickle of value, indeed they are the winners on all fronts. Good Jim. Then I suppose you wouldn't object to paying $275 a year for the service, having the list posted after midnight EST, and having the selections freely discussed at 6:35 a.m. the same day? Jim, that's not realistic at all. Not everyone is on MIRC or in another private chatroom. Nothing wrong, IMO, with people identifying the current watch list stocks as #1, #2, etc. Seems to me that was done on TSO for a while and you weren't raising a ruckus then.