Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : BNEZ and PMA; Success in 1999 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Doctorgreenback who wrote (2080)	1/29/1999 2:40:00 PM
From: andyman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2648

Doctorgreenback.....your post (2081) concerning the AOL suit makes a LOT of sense to me. I just hope you are right about the future share price of BNEZ too!!!!!!!!!!!!!

To: Doctorgreenback who wrote (2080)	1/29/1999 5:47:00 PM
From: heatseeker	Respond to of 2648

Not so sure it would be illegal..... It has happened before. Secondopinion was an investor in a company involved in a similar situation: The Teknowledge/Trilogy law suit I told you about settled about 3 or 4 years ago. Trilogy was sued by Teknowledge (I believe they were called CimflexTeknowledge when the case started) for patent infringement on one of their software designs. Teknowledge had all kinds of other trouble at the time and their stock had dropped to less than 1 cent per share. Trilogy bought up a serious block of stock at bargain basement prices. I think they ended up owning about 40% of the company. As part of the settlement, Trilogy agreed to divest themselves of all Teknowledge shares within 2 years of the settlement, but by that time Teknowledge was back on its feet and was selling for over 50 cents per share. Trilogy obviously made money on the deal although they would have made much more if they had been allowed to hold. The Teknowledge shares peaked about a year after they were out of the shares at $2.81. Never say never! heatseeker