Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (30789)	1/29/1999 12:59:00 PM
From: JBL	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

"I still find the characterization of Newt's dumping of the luridly detailed Starr report and Clinton videotape as "non-partisan and professional" highly amusing. Sure blew up in his face." The Starr report should have never been made public in its raw form. It was crual, disgusting and unnecessary. Starr should have done everything in his power to change Gingrich's mind. I don't know if he did, but he should have. As to the content, given the nature of Clinton's defense, Starr had no choice.

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (30789)	1/29/1999 1:03:00 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Look, I find the mutual recriminations on this thread tiresome, and I don't know who started it. I wish you would all stop, not just you, but jlallen and lorrie coey and pilch et al. Anyway, I don't know about everyone else on my side of the thread, but I do know about myself and a number of my acquaintances, and I know that Andrew Sullivan's analysis, while not entirely wrong, is overblown and a bit presumptuous.