SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (30946)1/29/1999 6:46:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit  Respond to of 67261
 
I think it is more than dubious. It is dangerous and could well be used to force some senators into a corner.

Just wait and see... The Republican hardliners will position the "finding of facts" motion a day or two BEFORE the motion to convict. So, if there are any Republican or Democrat senators that are thinking of voting for the former but against the latter, the right-wing hardliners will have a couple of days' time to really turn the screws on such "fence-sitters"...



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (30946)1/29/1999 10:00:00 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 67261
 
Like censure? JLA



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (30946)1/30/1999 9:24:00 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Although jlallen already mentioned it, I would like to underscore that if it is constitutional to censure Clinton, it is constitutional to say that the basis for censure is that he is guilty on the facts, but that an insufficient number of Senators thought the matter rose to the level of removal.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News