Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Bingo.com Ticker BIGR (formerly BIGG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuck Rubin who wrote (67)	1/30/1999 1:54:00 AM
From: Ali Shahbaz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1119

If you read carefully I have given you name "Canaccord Capital" (the biggest brokerage house in Vancouver at the corner of the Howe st.). I heard about this stock about two weeks ago. You are right I guess it is not that while back. Either way it does not change any thing I am not trying to stop any one from making money here. As I said I wish all of you guys the best of luck. Hopefully BIGG would be the home run stock for it's management and investors. Another thing why do you ask questions which you do not want to hear the answer. Don't ask a question if you don't know how one would reply.

To: Chuck Rubin who wrote (67)	1/30/1999 10:22:00 AM
From: jhild	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1119

THE COMPANY, KIND SIR, IS A STARTUP...NOT EVEN DOING BUSINESS YET. So I am sure that this means that there are no financials filed as I see none to date. While they seem to be trading I don't see their symbol listed at otcbb.com. otcbb.com So as I understand it this company is going to make money purely on its name? That people are going to sign up for free email services with them because of the name Bingo.com? . . . they want to get it on the big board. In order to do this they need to pump it to around 10.00/share. So you really think that people are going to buy this stock, on hype and just the name, because pumping it seems quite consistent with what you and Baz are doing? I noticed that he ducked the issue of compensation for his efforts pumping and denigrating the skeptics here, so I will ask you, if you are receiving any form of compensation or consideration for your activities here? (The reason I ask, of course, is this strengthens the SEC's case if it turns out that you not only didn't disclose, but actually lied about it.) I will be awaiting your answer. That goes for you too Mr. Baz, since you avoided answering that question. I think I will stay around and watch this story closely until I get definitive answers from you both on this issue.