Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (17624)	1/30/1999 6:45:00 AM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

Jeffrey, when was the suit originally filed? When was the company originally contacted and notified of the potential suit? Should it have been included in the filings to the SEC? From the old 10K Item 3. Legal Proceedings as of December 31, 1997. The Company is not the subject of any pending legal proceedings; and to the knowledge of management, no proceedings are presently contemplated against the Company by any federal, state, or local governmental agency. The Company initiated an action in the Clark County, Nevada District Court regarding title to shares of its Common Stock. Further, to the knowledge of management, no director or executive officer is party to any action in which any has an interest adverse to the Company. On 12/2/98 the company filed a 10Q: PART II - OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS None; not applicable.

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (17624)	1/30/1999 11:20:00 AM
From: Spider Valdez	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26163

"....Hey Dave, did Spidey tell you about the Nextech lawsuit against AZNT? Did he tell you the judge issued a summary judgment last week in favor of Nextech? No, you say. Well, why not?..." you are such a dunce guy. it has been addressed on this thread many times. 'nextech' = charles krisfelusi 1) aznt has filed this case against nextech 2) it is my understanding that there has yet to be a hearing & that the matter is in preliminary stage 3) there could have been no "summary judgements" as you tell shareholders since there has been no hearing 4) the matter pertains , as i recall, to the 224k shares of 144 of charlies & his attorney's tifers insistent demand ta lift legends on that stock before the restriction expired. i believe nextech counter sues also but i do not know why. to say this has not been addressed here is false. what can be better said is you & tonto appear to have stumbled upon some information you do not have the knowledge to discern. so like good bashers you attempt to make it fit your purpose here, to affect the aznt market. spider