Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: llamaphlegm who wrote (37702)	1/30/1999 9:20:00 AM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

Worth a read. sfgate.com

To: llamaphlegm who wrote (37702)	1/30/1999 10:59:00 AM
From: Impristine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

COCKamamie idea, how do you spell that shit, i've go your COCKamamie idea, right here, buddy, inverse relationship, oil futures, to internuts, inverse relationship, internuts to old money, Balderdash, Cockamamie, why do those dudes, hate the internet, can't they figure, out some way to drill oil, using the fricken internet, hey, why can't we just make a fricken, car out of the fricken, DRAM surplus, can't we just do that, is that surplus still a surplus, can we just take this transport index, throw it out the window, and make it the NON-transport index, can we make it the "STAY@HOME" index, can we use the universal fudge factor, change that STAY@HOME index and correlate it with the ISDEX, can we just take all those oils, cars, transports, and just run them right up, those internet dudes, ass, hey, why we are at it, can we just go out, and kill the health sector, can we put those Physical Therapist and doctors, on unemployment, so they have nothing else to do, but write gutter poetry....

To: llamaphlegm who wrote (37702)	1/31/1999 7:43:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Respond to of 164684

Merrill's absence from the deal will only increase pressure on Street analysts to toe the line and not say bad things about potentially lucrative underwriting clients. There you go, out in the open. The "stock analysts" of investment brokerages are no more than shills for the brokerage side of the business. Their mouths are bought and paid for with investment banking business from companies like Amazon.com. But of course everyone knew that. I wonder how Mary Meeker feels when there is no choice but to say positive things as a reslut err..result of "fundamental research". Probably she doesn't care, as long as she gets to laugh all the way to the bank (at those moronic sheep that bought AMZN at $185+...sorry Jenne).