SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Ask God -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Emile Vidrine who wrote (23988)1/30/1999 11:43:00 AM
From: Alan Markoff  Respond to of 39621
 
Let me correct your usage of the word Jew.

Yes Emilio correct the whole world with your gibberish..........

Do you endorse the links I presented to you............. the theology is the same....... I wonder why.

Alan



To: Emile Vidrine who wrote (23988)1/30/1999 3:11:00 PM
From: nihil  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 39621
 
Emile, thanks

One of the notable things about your posts is that I always feel more ignorant and more in need of a complete ablution after reading them than before.
The derivation of "Jew" in English is clear enough, I think: Giw, Ju (ME), giu, juiu (OF), Judaeus (L), Ioudios (Gr), Jahuday (Aram.), Y'hudi (Heb), Y'hudai, Judah. But why do you only hate the members of the tribe of Judah or the nation of Judea? Don't you have enough hate to handle the Levites, Benjaminites, and the other remnants? True, Jesus only claimed to be King of the Judeans, in heritage from the earlier Judaen kings, but he (or some Mormon passing through) traced his ancestry back to David who claimed (and enforced his claim) to be not just the King of Judea but even the King of Israel.
I think it is ridiculous that you do not hate all of the sons of Jacob, and not just the Judeans. It shows sort of a circumscribed and restricted form of bigotry. If you really worked at it, you might grow to hate all Semites ("descendants of Shem"), or at least all Hebrews ("they who came across the river).

Here's to progress!