Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (31029)	1/30/1999 12:25:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Maybe. But you still have to take it up with Gramm and Shelby. At any rate, what legal meaning does it have? Would it mean anything in court? The Senate proceedings are hardly operating under anything like conventional courtroom procedure. And constitutionally speaking, it's not their place to "find facts" in the judicial sense. It sounds like a somewhat arbitrary appropriation of judicial terminology, if nothing else. The Republicans can dump whatever they want on Clinton, it's their rules. The Republicans also have to come up with a better slogan for Y2K than "you're stupid and we're not!". Or maybe you can sell it, eh, Neocon?