Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ARP - V Argentina Gold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck who wrote (2392)	1/30/1999 1:21:00 PM
From: Mr. Oil	Respond to of 3282

This leads us to conclude Barrick knows very well that the resource is very rich and they want it all. Not just part but every last oz of gold silver lead zinc pyrite kimberlite cryptonite and rock that the property contains. They are like the farmer sure...He said "I don't want 'all' the land. I just want the land next to me". Barrick can have it all if they want but they better be prepared to pay for ALL of it. They can't have have it ALL by paying only for a small % of it. This is business not charity...They had better get real! Here is one other reason why! ** UPDATED POLE TENDERING SHARES TO BARRICK at $5.00 **** So far I have received 30 responses from various threadsters and lurkers. The results are definitely favoring a higher price Barrick. Those willing to tender shares to Barrick at $5.00 ........0 ZERO Those not willing to tender at $5.00...................... 30 Not one shareholder has said they would tender their shares to Barick at $5.00. What does this look like to you folks? Our little pole suggests that Barrick is going to have to put the price way up if they want to acquire ARP. Ray