Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Mansfield who wrote (27358)	1/30/1999 5:16:00 PM
From: IngotWeTrust	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116764

Somehow, picturing the FedReserve globally eunuchicated Emperor Greenspandex w/no clothes just doesn't inspire Y2K confidence in this ole prospector. One good thing, tho'...William JClinton will become "free willie, free at last" on his way to jail if sealed indictments filed on Dec 14 by Kenneth Starr are implementable!!! O/49r

To: John Mansfield who wrote (27358)	1/30/1999 7:24:00 PM
From: John Hunt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116764

Y2K lawsuit could cost AT&T and Lucent $1-billion << AT&T Corp. and Lucent Technologies Inc. have been hit with a massive Y2K class action suit that could leave the U.S. telecommunications giants on the hook for more than $1-billion in damages. The lawsuit, brought on behalf of anyone who bought mid-size office telephone systems that are not Y2K compliant, could turn out to be one of the largest filed in connection with the millennium bug. The complaint, filed yesterday in New Jersey state court, alleges AT&T and Lucent sold defective systems up to late 1997 knowing they would work only until Dec. 31, 1999. -- cont'd -- >> canoe.ca Y2K should keep the lawyers in pocket change for many years.