Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (17650)	1/30/1999 7:59:00 PM
From: Spider Valdez	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

janice dear , do you remember the "judgement" from the 'sept.' "arbitration hearing" you were "procuring & scanning" for us all to see? well i have feeling this will be what will result if you are saying nextech got a "summary judgement" against aznt. more of your basher dribble. we do know that charlie krisfelusi's lawyer greg tifer sued charlie himself in calif.. he won. tifer wanted to get this transfered to nevada which he did & got court order for aznt to give him charlies restricted stock. instead, since the stock was not free trading aznt filed to get this stock cancelled & the matter is in court now in the preliminary stages. there have been no judgements & tifer sued his client charlie krisfelusi, not aznt. if this court order is what you are refering to, then you are posting more dribble in your crusade to influence investors & to harm our aznt investment on behalf of the shortsellers of aznt. * you promote & defend wellrich, a boiler-room that solicits stock while not being a licensed b & d. you promoted a "judgement" you said they were granted against aznt. you went as far to say you were "scanning" the document. you later had to admit you lied. you also state there was an arbitration hearing 5 jan. that qualey & sylver attended. you went as far as to say that there is a police report filed due to sylver's illegal behavoir at the hearing. you have yet to prove this. as a matter of fact, sylver was negotiating stipulation with dtc so dtc could be dropped from the case that day. that can be verified. so sylver's presence is accounted for. * you defended andy mann. you presented several defenses on his behalf including his claims that the prommisory notes were stamped "paid" by sylver & when that got tiring, you told us that andy mann paid for the stock in question with "neck & back" stock. i informed you that was not so. i informed you that reg s deal can not be paid for with stock. you then went back to your dribble that sylver "gave" andy mann the stock. in truth, andy mann could not, would not & did not defend himself in court. he disputed no material issues & a default was entered against him 13 jan.. so, though you fought for andy mann & played the shill by defending him on s.i., andy mann could not defend himself in a court of law. you & your group have fought long & hard on behalf of those who stold stock from aznt, those that shorted this stolen stock & those who solicit stock to cover these short position. as you continue your smear campaign of aznt hoping to manipulate & affect the stock price for those you defend & promote, aznt shareholders patiently wait for the legal system to administor justice. spider