Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (31085)	1/30/1999 4:28:00 PM
From: Jack Be Quick	Respond to of 67261

<<P.S. My recollection on Barr and the white supremacists is that he made a keynote address or something. Saying he didn't know what he was doing is suspect.>> Here's a site for info on that kind of stuff that you might find interesting (I don't know anything about the sponsors, I stumbled onto it through a websearch on Tom Delay) sit.wisc.edu

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (31085)	1/30/1999 7:12:00 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Even The Washington Post stated that although it is not hard to come upon white supremacist views within the organization, it is not billed up front as that kind of organization, rather some of its members are from that background. Barr did not belong. I have no reason to doubt his account. The traditional understanding is that statecraft requires expedients that would be considered more harshly when employed for purely personal gain, because of the greater responsibility entailed in protecting the community. But, hey, I guess I'm not the dread "absolutist" either, but recognize circumstances in moral calculation. Partisan or not, the President is revealed to be a liar and a cad. Now, we have to react to that.