Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (31147)	1/31/1999 1:39:00 AM
From: Jack Be Quick	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<< and empowering the states instead of federalizing everything in sight, that the party is at least as coherent as the Democrats >> Yeah, well, I suppose that if you are going to shut down the entire U.S. Government in the hope that the American people, upon realizing that they really haven't the slightest use for the Federal Government anyway, will rise up in support, then you probably want to have a platform supporting the empowerment of the states; if you want to be at least as coherent as the democrats, that is. But maybe not.

To: Neocon who wrote (31147)	1/31/1999 1:04:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

The biggest disconnect between the 2 parts of the republican party is in the social engineering laws to promote lifestyle behavior. The family values crowd (Quayle, Largent etc) promote all kinds of laws specifically designed to condone their ideal lifestyle. The fiscal conservative less government crowd (Dunn et al) want nothing to do with this kind of legislation. Heres an example of the policy amendments the pro-family republicans want to make to encourage their objective: policyreview.com So tell me, Are the republicans for less laws, regulation, government intervention or not???