SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LTK007 who wrote (7613)1/30/1999 9:54:00 PM
From: moby_dick  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 122087
 
C'mon max - do you honestly think PRFM is the next AMZN? I mean honestly now.

Moby.



To: LTK007 who wrote (7613)1/30/1999 9:58:00 PM
From: Ralph Cosenza  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
Max,
Ask yourself this question: Would Bobby Orr be the same player in todays hockey game? Would Babe Ruth hit the same amount of homers with todays pitching?

I ask myself: Would Amazon.com end up being as successful as they are if they just started business today? My answer is no. Why?
Because Amazon got it before the INET craze happened. There was very little competition and they grabbed the quick market share. Look at the other companies starting to sell books. Why arent their market cap the same.



To: LTK007 who wrote (7613)1/30/1999 10:02:00 PM
From: jjs_ynot  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 122087
 
AMZN was successful because they were first, fast and best. They gobbled up the prime real estate on the web before their competition understood what that meant.

None of these conditions apply to PRFM. Look at all the also-rans trying to catch up with PTVL, AMZN, CDNW/NTKI. PRFM looks like another also-ran.



To: LTK007 who wrote (7613)1/30/1999 10:13:00 PM
From: bluejeans  Respond to of 122087
 
not sure that AMZN had this much competition on line already.

dir.yahoo.com