Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: moby_dick who wrote (7614)	1/30/1999 11:52:00 PM
From: jlib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Yeah, one of the guys who couldn't handle it turns out to be someone who had a hype post included in my missive. I posted it here so I wouldn't offend them on their own thread and so what happens they come here and cross post it to PRFM and now it is all over, even Yahoo I heard. Talk about self destructive behavior! It is a Ponzi at this point. They need to bring in more naive investors to fill the bottom of the pyramid. Notice the regular comment that Anthony may eventually be right but that his timing is wrong. What does that mean? It means they expect the stock to crash but only after it goes up first and they get out. All the new investors will be burned. I feel sorry for them but, hey, it's like paying tuition for a valuable education. I've already graduated summa cum laude from that school. Another thing that is hilarious is that some have claimed that Anthony's short calls have enough influence to drive a stock down. One need only look at a couple of his near misses to laugh at that. He calls a short on troubled stocks that are going to crash whether he is even in this universe or not. Or they say they don't like him posting to the stock boards because it scares the new investors away. It really doesn't make any difference whether he posts or not but I'll bet there are a few right here who were enlightened by him before it was too late. Or they say he has a shady past but then don't even investigate on their own. I went to his profile and did a search on things like "NASD," "SEC," "reputation." It was certainly an eye opener. And then there are those who just don't like his personality. And you know something, that is really OK. Everyone is different. So, anyway I didn't get to thank you for those great, great articles you posted. I was hoping for a small spike up on Monday but, oh well, can't have everything. Best, Jimmy Liberato

To: moby_dick who wrote (7614)	1/31/1999 2:47:00 AM
From: jlib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

"got to push this baby to limits unknown to mankind!!!!!" A correspondent sent me the following. He had noticed the butchering of my name on a SI post posted to Yahoo and asked me if it was me. This howler is in response to my CNBC letter mentioned at Message 7574411 by: Hotstocktips Just emailed cnbc squak box powerlunch and every fricking email address they have telling them to cover PRFM, I think that you all should do the same. If they get 500 emails regarding the same topic, I'm sure they are bound to cover it. Also I ask that all of you tomorrow follow CNBC and call in during any Taking Stock segments and see if one of us can get through and mention PRFM. owning shares is not enough we got to push this baby to limits unknown to mankind!!!!!