Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Dream Machine ( Build your own PC ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave Bissett who wrote (5720)	1/30/1999 10:13:00 PM
From: Spots	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14778

>> Celeron 366 and 400... I have read ABOUT people checking these out but have read nothing but sketchy results and have no info on stability. Sounds promising, though. Still, for me, I am basically not an overclocker and am in the game for a special situation. Others may have more to say. Dan's a good candidate -- seems like he's building a new system every other day, in between reloads of SP4 ... <G>. (Sorry, Dan, a cheap shot I admit, but highly satisfactory nevertheless <gg>.) >>Also, I'm wondering if the BH6 supports the 366 as is w/ existing BIOS THIS is an easy one; even I can answer. Nope, different socket. 366/400 are "Socket 370", not a place to plug in an ageing mainframe but rather a socket with 370 pinholes. Check out the BM6, ABIT's brand new socket 370 offering. Now that I've said that, there may be a slot 1 (BH6) version of one or both of these. Something sticks in my head but I can't extract it at the moment. Anyhow, word has it Intel wants to kill the slot 1 celeron, which makes sense since the sucker's all on the die anyway, so I think the word is pretty good.