Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI Grammar and Spelling Lab -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Edwarda who wrote (1836)	1/31/1999 11:40:00 PM
From: Nittany Lion	Respond to of 4711

Interesting how one misspelled word can change the whole meaning to this post I found tonight. It brought tears to my eyes. (I added the boldface) To: curious (260 ) From: Larry Brew Sunday, Jan 31 1999 10:48PM ET Reply # of 264 Mary, Only 11 more hours before the RUMBLE begins. Two superbowels back to back. Don't get that often. As for the fight against cancer, Tech Master has posted often. He's a champion on the issue. I agree most are after cashing in on the volatility. There's just some that see it as a scam. A long running one at that eh. It took me awhile to believe in their research myself. TM knows my historical position on that issue. It's certainly not a cure all, but a giant step beyond conventional radiation. I'm glad I stuck with Celn. I hope they can compete with the other players with stronger finances. If investors read beyond the finance in the 10k, they would see several companies are pursuing this solution also. It has merit! Larry Gary

To: Edwarda who wrote (1836)	2/1/1999 4:30:00 AM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4711

From the bureau of redundancy department: Press releases often announce that one company has "entered into" a strategic alliance with another. Does this expression bug anyone else, or am I riding my hobby-horse again. ;-} While I am at it, is a "strategic alliance" correctly defined as a non-binding relationship with no empirically measurable benefit to either company, but out of which one or both gain PR mileage? Perhaps I am being excessively cynical, but I've always thought it a shaky sign when a company announces "strategic relationships" as opposed to contracts. Steve