SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (31232)1/31/1999 4:05:00 PM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Cynicism, in blanket form, communicates that self-interest is behind all important decisions and actions. It is a most powerful lock that helps keep the cycle of mistrust in operation. Cynicism makes fear and a sense of powerlessness total certainties. It drives individuals to become negative "realists" about human nature and about their country. Not being cynical is held to be naive. Not speaking up becomes the "smart" way to operate. Trusting that a President might actually have our best interest in mind is considered stupid.

It is clear that some people feel the cycle of mistrust more strongly and deeply than others. Their actions and thoughts implicitly express its assumptions and self-protective strategies.

We can all thank the Clinton administration for driving fear and mistrust in the Presidency to the highest level this country has ever seen.

In the final analysis Daniel, this impeachment issue doesn't hinge on whether other people did or did not do the same things as the President. It hinges on whether we are willing as a nation to change the cycle of cynicism and uphold the principles this country was founded on. Honesty, integrity, courage, trust, trusworthiness and fairness are not something we should dismiss as a prerequisite for the Presidency. To openly dismiss these traits is to guarantee there open dismissal in the future.

Michael



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (31232)1/31/1999 4:18:00 PM
From: Bob Lao-Tse  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Once again, a Clinton partisan tries to make this a moral issue. It's not moral Daniel, it's legal. Look the two words up if you still fail to see the distinction. The thing I dread is not moral relativism, but legal relativism. You should too.

-BLT