To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (31250 ) 1/31/1999 5:52:00 PM From: Bob Lao-Tse Respond to
Patricia, thanks for the response. It's heartening to learn that you don't really support Clinton pardoning himself. And it's nice to get a post that I can respond calmly to. Despite what others (Daniel for instance) may think, I get a great deal of enjoyment out of finding common ground with people with whom I otherwise disagree.$100 million pursuing Reagan and came up with nothing. I personally think that this is not because Reagan was innocent of any wrongdoing, but simply because Clinton is more egregious in his crimes. But either way, that's over $150 million that could have been spent in a better way. (Or could have never been stolen from us in the first place, but that's another topic).is impeachable, but is not grounds for removal, and that he should be indicted and tried as soon as he leaves office. I believe that this last sanction is the only one that should have happened regardless, but I also feel that the Jones case should have been postponed until after he left office, and it's at least barely possible that if he hadn't been President he wouldn't have felt compelled to perjure himself. I personally feel that he would have anyway, because I honestly believe that Clinton is pathological and genuinely believes his own lies, but that's neither here nor there.have to be followed, even if the Senate vote is a foregone conclusion (which I'm not yet convinced of). Now that we're in this situation, we must follow the legally mandated path, and only then can we set about changing things to try to prevent this sort of divisiveness from happening in the future.all politicians, Democrat and Republican alike, only stand to gain from our divisions, and all citizens only stand to lose.
