Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (31358)	1/31/1999 11:00:00 PM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 67261

I think I made it clear earlier that you are free to doubt Paula, although I think that you should be a bit more indecisive about it, given the murkiness of the thing. I told you the grounds of my disbelief of Carville, what do you think of them? Let's see--- Walsh indicted Weinberger and Abrams on bogus perjury beefs that few, if any, prosecutors would have brought, because he was frustrated and hoping to squeeze somebody. He also released a tendentious report before the '92 election, asserting conclusions that he had not been able to prove. So I wouldn't tout Walsh as a model of probity. By the way, he also spent a lot and came up with little. As I said to Dickson, I would gladly join in a call for repealing the SP statute.