SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (31380)2/1/1999 1:30:00 AM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Gee, I don't know Daniel. Are you saying of all the Drudge reports the major media decided to run this one story on every outlet as the top news item? And why didn't they name him as the source of the story?

What does that tell you? :-)

Michael



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (31380)2/1/1999 5:38:00 AM
From: JBL  Respond to of 67261
 
Daniel,

The following is not with the intent to be mean or insulting. I would just like to know if you know certain things that I do not know.

This is from today's Whashington Post, where they mention the breakfast between Jordan and Lewinsky. Incredibly, they do not even bother telling their readers that Jordan categorically denies that this breakfast ever took place.

Either I'm not well informed, and Jordan admitted to having breakfast with Lewinsky, or the Washington Post has zero journalistic integrity. I just cannot believe they would have done this. May be the other accounts I read of Jordan denying the breakfast are not accurate. Would you happen to know ?

I just want to know wether I have been misled or not.

Best regards,

"...And after a breakfast on Dec. 31, when Lewinsky broached the possibility of Hillary Clinton leaving her husband eventually, she said Jordan said, "Well, maybe you two will have an affair when he's out of office."

Said Lewinsky, "I was shocked because I thought Mr. Jordan had known that we already had this affair . . . and I said, well, we already had an affair. We just – you know, we didn't have sex or did everything but sex," or something like that. And he just kind of went . . . mmph."

Jordan's level of knowledge – and he has never been questioned about Lewinsky's testimony – is potentially significant both because of the job search and because of conflicting accounts between Jordan and Lewinsky about the degree to which he reviewed the contents of her false affidavit. Jordan said he did not discuss it with Lewinsky beforehand and only skimmed it afterward, but Lewinsky testified she showed him a draft and discussed changing a sentence to avoid any suggestion she had been alone with Clinton."



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (31380)2/1/1999 7:25:00 AM
From: jimpit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
Daniel,

Saturday evening, Drudge reported that the NYTimes would run the story Sunday morning.

See, if you'd visit the Drudge site, you'd know firsthand.

BTW, the NYT story is sounding more and more like a Slick "plant".
I know, you don't believe that Slick or his henchmen would do such
a thing but, that possibility DOES exist.