Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Irb who wrote (10896)	2/1/1999 10:46:00 AM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

Obstruction of Justice--Sillier my butt-hahaha. I guess you haven't honestly perused the facts. Of course I don't think he'll go either- I can only hope. But many feel, just as the constitution allows for the removal of say, a drunken President who persists in drunken public displays of rude talk...it allows for the removal of a sex addict perjuring thoughtlessly offensive to women liar. My old hippie girlfriend thinks so! Quite liberal she is at times- like here for instance...long time NOW supporter she is. For what it's worth, with 80% of the people believing he lied, perjured, obstructed justice, etc.... . If he were removed few would care in a week. But if Dems go ahead and let him off as expected, there is a definite base of folks from all parties and walks of life who will be long upset. Republicans once again got more votes than Democrats in the last election. In the face of this issue, that makes two in a row...a modern record I'd guess.

To: The Irb who wrote (10896)	2/1/1999 11:03:00 AM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13994

Lying about fellatio I don't really care about. A matter between he and his family and a consenting unpaid intern I don't care about. But when by hiding such he continues his pattern of publically destroying a woman for years because his behavior is too embarrassing, as evidenced by the Lewinsky truth(he has no credibility in any he said/she said case any longer), is another matter. The reputation of Jones would still be s**T without this evidence, and she'd have collected nothing. As I've said many times, this is a simple truth, and history will remember.