Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (72602)	2/1/1999 1:27:00 PM
From: Paul Fiondella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

The Privacy Group That Took On Intel nytimes.com Annual budget $250,000 which employs 3 full-time and 3 part-time people plus expenses.

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (72602)	2/1/1999 3:14:00 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

McMannis - Re: "How do you completely get the ID problem off the chip? Re-design and make some new masks?" As I said, there will be no need to get rid of the feature. Since it is implemented by PROGRAMMABLE Flash Cells during the various post-fab testing sequences, Intel can just skip the programming step - or program in a dummy code. In fact the dummy code now being considered at Intel is "J-I-M-M-C-M-A-N-N-I-S". Paul