Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (27475)	2/1/1999 1:52:00 PM
From: long-gone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116762

<<What do you all think? And what would that mean should the CB's use that justification to sell gold reserves into the market to help meet demand?>> We know 3 of these "reported sales" never happened and the Canadian sale last year was reported twice at differing times the last with the date hidden in the body of the "report"- the bulk of this "news" there for must be viewed as what it is blatant attempts at manipulation of the world gold market. They have not and will not happen. Your continued pointing toward(these same) false sales must also be viewed in the same light. Oh, I suspect, anytime now, for yet another sale to be rumored - I'll even guess that this "news(ha)" will be broken by Reuters. So, I can't figure why you guys in the jewelry industry wish a lower price. Often a higher price drives many to buy more not less.

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (27475)	2/1/1999 3:02:00 PM
From: lorne	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116762

Hello Ron, You said >>>Btw, I was reflecting on Y2K this morning and the apparent call for people to have sufficient cash on hand. We know there is a lack of hard currency available in quantities to handle likely demand. <<< Who the heck is the " WE" in the " We Know" statment above. Take care Lorne