Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Irb who wrote (10915)	2/1/1999 2:44:00 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13994

<< A better reason to drop the trial would be that the nation has many problems that need attention from Congress ... >> The Republicans are saying that the hundreds of hours they they are spending in their political attack on Clinton has not effected the amount of the work that they do in Congress for the people. That leads me to believe that they are either lying about this, or that they usually don't do too much work.

To: The Irb who wrote (10915)	2/1/1999 4:13:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

First, I would say that determining whether we allow a perjurer and obstructor of justice to remain in office is at least as important as anything else on our collective plate. Second, what is your employment? I'm a lawyer and not only myself but many other legal professionals believe that Starr's record is exemplary and that his work ethic is an admirable one. As you are a layman, I can understand your feeling, but that does not validate your view. Finally, beating that dead horse again, Henry Hyde is not sitting in judgment of adultery. Hyde is pressing his case for perjury and obstruction of justice. The perjury is evident. The obstruction is more circumstantial but a good case nevertheless. JLA