To: tanoose who wrote (2477 ) 2/1/1999 7:22:00 PM From: Mr. Oil Respond to of 3282
>>You can compare all you want, to the other property's etc and how big the deposit is, without a competing serious bid, I believe Barrick is going to walk off with a very great deposit for a song?? A competing bid is what is needed??..............the lack of a competing bid is telling me thus far at least, that the economy of scale is in Barricks hand, and that is the way the other company's must see it?? << Frank, the absence of a competing bid at this juncture does not necessarily mean that... 1. Barrick will get the deposit for a song nor 2. there won't be a competing bid when more of the resource is proven. I would like to think, maybe I am naive, but even if there is only one bid to purchase ARP, that ARP shareholders must still decide to sell and tender their shares. If the deposit is thought to be worth much more than the ABX offer, then it is my opinion that ARP shareholders will say no...not at this price and refuse to tender. Then if ABX wants it they will have to convince ARP shareholders that their offer is fair or they themselves will be convinced by drill results that in fact it is not fair and subsequently increase their offer to an acceptable amount. Your point is well taken however that without a competing bid ARP shareholders will likely cave in to the buyout at a price less than it is really worth. It is my hope that the resource is sufficiently rich as to give other bidders the fever of desire to have it no matter what Barricks strength. Remember they can make an offer with a competition clause which pays them handsomely if they are finally out bid by Barrick. In fact I would say the Lundins are using this to solicit a competing bid right now. You know what they say, It aint over til the 'fleshly endowed' lady sings.(I hope this is politically acceptable). At this point the Lundins don't seem to indicate that she is even close to the warm up cords. I would hang on for the last chapter!!! Ray