SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Level Head who wrote (17762)2/1/1999 10:06:00 PM
From: TopCat  Respond to of 26163
 
>>>Spider, why would you do that?<<<

Level,

Spider does this (IMO) because he is of the belief that if he aggressively defends the stock (especially on topics not related to the fundamentals of the stock), he will see an appreciation in the value of the investment he has made in the stock (whatever that is).

I believe he has done this before on other stocks under various different monikers. If this is true, his track record is very poor because he doesn't seem to understand that his techniques tend to only cast doubt on the stock rather than build confidence in it.

While I doubt the value of this stock (based on information the company has or has not provided), I have often wondered what would be happening with the value of this stock if "Spider" had stayed away and not drawn the interest of the people that also doubt the value of this particular investment. Hard to know for sure....but I think, without Spider's involvement, this stock would be much higher now. Not because it deserved it, but because (right or wrong.....mostly wrong...IMO) they had a well crafted story to tell at the beginning....good enough to attract a multitude of innocent investors.

Unfortunately, Spider thinks that he is adding value. The fact is, he has continued to spread enough crap about this stock...that even the "innocent investor" has grown suspicious.

Just one more thing......I don't think "Spider" is intelligent enough to ever understand what I just wrote.

Cheers,
TC



To: Level Head who wrote (17762)2/1/1999 11:44:00 PM
From: antibash  Respond to of 26163
 
A "shill" as I understand it, is a person who is compensated for making a product/service/stock seem desirable when it is not. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Is this the only way you understand that "shill" is expressed? lololololololol

Your not worth the time Head!!!

anti