Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : PERFUMANIA.COM . . PRFM . . .FOR LONGS ONLY -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rande Is who wrote (1724)	2/2/1999 8:18:00 AM
From: JBH	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2489

How does one come across this type of info before the fact? Message 7599020

To: Rande Is who wrote (1724)	2/2/1999 8:58:00 AM
From: Dante Sinferno	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2489

I've watched you engage in what "seems like" collusion , manipulation , and misrepresentation. Furthermore , when you sounded the clarion call to hype PRFM on other threads , it's likely that those who responded immediately figured PRFM was a short. You are the one with blood on your hands not Anthony. You are hardly the type of person that I would do a favor for. Do it yourself , and I'm asking that you don't ever post publicly or privately to me again per the SI terms of service. Rob

To: Rande Is who wrote (1724)	2/2/1999 10:27:00 AM
From: jlib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2489

Oh, yeah, I also added that CNBC's fluff piece on Friday didn't even have any novelty value because of the dozens of preexisting discount perfume websites. A press release (an inept one at that) does not news make. Come on! Perfume? It is a dying custom and a social faux pas in many situations now. Every woman I know says she's got years worth of the stuff lying around. Nobody cares about a perfume website (it is a technically nice one, though). That is all this bubble was based on. And since you like crossposting my articles, here are a few more: Let's go global: techstocks.com Tuition time: techstocks.com The greater fool theory: techstocks.com An even greater fool: Message 7578831 Wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole: Message 7592848 I personally took a short position before Anthony announced his as I think a few others did. There was no conspiracy. It was the most obvious trade I've ever made. I am sorry many were hurt, particularly any novice investors. I know you all just wanted to get in on a hot stock. This thing was rotten from the start and there is no way to cover that up. There will be new opportunities to recoup (but not with this one). I made it a point to not post on this board while I was short. Yet my articles kept being crossposted here by antagonists. I am out of this stock now so here is my first and last post. I'll leave you with the kind of information I search for when looking for crap stocks: techstocks.com Good luck to you all! Jimmy Liberato