Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : GGNC - GIC/Global Intertainment Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kmac who wrote (1968)	2/2/1999 10:26:00 AM
From: Mac S. Giballa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2585

Carlos, as usual you're right on the money. I have to say that if they really use E & Y I would be impressed, and would ease off in my skeptcism about this company. But changing auditors at this point would just be more ugliness (IMO). KMAC, stop being a dogmatic apologist for the company. If you are an investor than maintain a healthy skepticism, and ask questions. Right now all you try to do is quash questions.

To: kmac who wrote (1968)	2/2/1999 2:23:00 PM
From: C.Carlos	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2585

Ispoke with a guy named Keith. He said he got in to help because there have been some changes in personnel and things need to be fixed. He did say that he is not sure if E & Y would end up being the auditors. I told him what I thought regarding the image problem of changing auditors at this point when the company's reputation has been questioned. I also mentioned the market's concern regarding hype. He said that he feels that there hasn't been much "hype" in the last month, which is somewhat true. I agree with you in that changing auditors is not unusual. What is unusual is posting on your web page that XYZ firm will be your auditors and then saying that it will not be that way. However, I am willing to consider a reasonable explanation fot that. As it stands now, I think that changing auditors will be like trying to change a tire in the middle of a car race without stopping the car first. To be honest, I must add that he was also very bullish about the company's future. It appears they are working on some deals with internet players at the level of Yahoo that are expected to bring in a lot of traffic. At this stage, however, that is pure speculation which is not healthy for the company's image. I am bullish, but I need to see some concrete steps taken by management in order to regain faith in this company. I didn't sell today because I was in a meeting with a client all morning and I don't think I should sell at $2.50. I'll give this company another two weeks, which by the way is the period of time the company feels it will take for the stock to rebound (forward looking statements under the provisions of bla, bla, bla...). C. Carlos