Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Yousef who wrote (48135)	2/2/1999 2:35:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Respond to of 1580703

Chimp #2, I'm not mistaken about the 400. Yes they had a problem with yields at that speed bin BUT they got there and filled their obligations. On the other hand you said AMD wouldn't get to 300, 333, 350, 366, 380 or 400. Guess what, they did. As far as your investing prowess, who knows what you're playing retroactively at this time but if what you say is true and you shorted after taking profits on a run up, you did well. But you haven't covered. I didn't short but jumped out before the 13 point fall (after a 16 point run up) only to come back in at 21. So I guess if that makes me a "loser" in your eyes then so be it. On the same note, No. 1 Chimp failed to sell at 32 and watched as 1/3 of his investment evaporated, so what do you call him? "BIG LOSER"? Is this a challenge to become #1 Chimp? Jim