Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : PERFUMANIA.COM . . PRFM . . .FOR LONGS ONLY -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Matt Brown who wrote (1834)	2/2/1999 8:56:00 PM
From: lloyd bashaw	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 2489

Matt, Why are u so upset? All I am saying is that the CFO jumped ship. It's a fact. He did. He bailed. He left. When CFO's leave, financial nightmares always follow.

To: Matt Brown who wrote (1834)	2/2/1999 9:03:00 PM
From: TheLineMan	Respond to of 2489

"Who is going to lay down $50,000 in a stock that everybody argues over.". That's not the question you should be asking try "Who is going to lay down $50,000 for a stock with poor management who've been dumping the stock while trying to hype it with flimsy press release. The answer = dopes. If you're quick enough and don't hold too long some people may make some money on the long side. But the fact of the matter is shorts are guaranteed a profit wether tomorrow, the end of the week, even if it takes a year. It's a crappy company - it will go down. I think that is why longs in stocks like this exhibit the fear - they know they need bigger fools to buy into the hype, and deep inside they know what kind of a feeble company this is.