Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (45496)	2/2/1999 11:49:00 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Did you just make the one purchase of April 75s? Seems early to roll, even with the quadruple. Just touched 75 today got to be more downside soon -- why not save on the additional premie. BWDIK and kick me.

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (45496)	2/3/1999 9:17:00 AM
From: valueminded	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 132070

Mike: 1.I thought when you had first bought the CDWC, they were april 70's purchased at around 2-3. Since the bid is 5 how do you get a quadruple unless you averaged down from your first purchase of them. 2. Ref money expansion. Mike, unless I am wrong (which is quite possible) wouldnt you expect that this would end in an inflationary cycle. If money grows by 15% annually and inflation + GDP growth is approx 7%, what happens to the other 8% . . . either it shows up later in terms of inflation or it has to be destroyed somehow. Yes/No ? thanks 3 Ref - the fed model for stocks. Is this for real ? Only 17% overvalued according to them. Seems like it leaves a lot of stuff out. Like risk <g>