To: Matt Brown who wrote (8501 ) 2/3/1999 12:03:00 AM From: Joe Pirate Respond to of 122087
>>Anthony, >>Congrats on your scheme. Without the power of SI, you would be >>nothing. You unfairly cheat people out of their money. >>I have learned a lot about manipulation since you got on the PRFM >>board. I won't get burned again..luckily I got out today thanks to >>that PR. I disagree, if you look at the numbers I crunched todayMessage 7625605 you will notice that if you took his advise and closed out the postion 2 months later (intead of when he recommended which was much earlier), the data clearly indicates 26 winners, 2 break-even, and 6 losers. I don't think there is any manipulation. In fact this is what I truely believe after charting all those stocks. These stocks clearly KEPT dropping EVEN after the recommendation to cover the positions. If it was manipulation, then these stocks would most likely be trading at levels closer to the picked numbers after the "deed" was done. Alot of the short picks were stocks that soared to incredible heights in a very short period of time, maybe a few days. The patterns are typical from off the shelf "stock screening" software. Bascically, you can run the software, then do some quick research and basically pick the "real" losers. Lets face it, when a no-name stocks peaks to abnormal heights, there is a 90% chance that it WILL FALL !! Any experienced stock market "person" can tell you that. The difference between A@P and the casual trader/investor is he has the balls to perform the "short" as others would just leave it alone. Pirate P.S. Alot of people seem to think that message boards are the catalyst behind stock manipulation, but in fact there was stock market manipulation dating back to the times when computers did NOT exist, manipulation far worse that we see today. They write book about it, very interesting games they played in the past.