Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Singleton who wrote (45508)	2/3/1999 8:10:00 AM
From: yard_man	Respond to of 132070

lack of growth due to price-slashing, eh? Maybe it was a typo ...

To: Peter Singleton who wrote (45508)	2/3/1999 8:43:00 AM
From: Earlie	Respond to of 132070

Peter: Good post. "poached",.... loved it. (g) Best, Earlie

To: Peter Singleton who wrote (45508)	2/3/1999 10:45:00 AM
From: Knighty Tin	Respond to of 132070

Peter, But there was no inventory glut. They all told us that. <G> BTW, the thread is monolithic now, but we are going stereo next year and quadraphonic after we whip the Y3K problem. MB

To: Peter Singleton who wrote (45508)	2/3/1999 11:04:00 AM
From: Knighty Tin	Respond to of 132070

Earlie and Peter, did I read that pc server chart right? Compaq, which Jim "The Everwrong Bunny" Cramer says is executing on all cylinders, lost a little market share while HWP, which the same source says is "a company specific example of a company that is not executing well" gained huge market share? Wait a second. I figured out where I got confused. Cramer is not talking about actually conducting business. He is talking about spinning what happened so it looks good when it is horrible. Thus, HWP doesn't execute well because they tell the truth. Got it now. <G> MB