Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hogger who wrote (17909)	2/3/1999 2:15:00 AM
From: s martin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

I'll bite. What about your contract?

To: Hogger who wrote (17909)	2/3/1999 2:24:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 26163

Why not talk about my contract? I received AZNT shares ... does that put me on some kind of 'FBN Hit List?' Hey, we're cool with it! But I wonder if the SEC will be? HOW many times have you denied any business relationship with the company, as you hyped it? Shall we dig out the posts? Maybe tomorrow. Remember Ron Reece? You'll recall he just settled with the SEC. Was fined $10K for non-disclosure. Is this AZNT/Dobry contract another fabrication, or was it substantiated by Judd? To what prior "fabrication" do you allude? You're digging yourself an ever deeper hole, just like Spidey.

To: Hogger who wrote (17909)	2/18/1999 12:23:00 AM
From: Michelino	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

As a unbiased lurker, I feel that I must ask you a question or two: You clearly authored a statement implying that you received shares in AZNT as per written agreement with the company:"Why not talk about my contract? I received AZNT shares ..." ( siliconinvestor.com Any reader will interpret the two clauses as directly linked because one "fact" (receiving the shares) is stated as an answer to your own rhetorical question. Of course, both clauses were written in succession and as part of the same paragraph: Clear evidence that both sentences were intended to be united in meaning. Are you really trying to convince the Internet that you are owed an apology because Janice believed your own statement? If so, may I state that one might deduce, uh...apriori, that yours is a brutally independent nose...even as it continues to grow.

To: Hogger who wrote (17909)	10/29/1999 1:16:00 AM
From: Level Head	Respond to of 26163

"Why not talk about my contract? I received AZNT shares ... does that put me on some kind of 'FBN Hit List?'" At the time that I read this, I had not yet read the AZNT thread from the beginning. Your subsequent writings and attempted cover-ups regarding this post demonstrated to my satisfaction that you were a complete and rather ignorant liar willing to give up all traces of credibility to mistakenly cling to a bit of self-importance. Your pattern of behavior since has changed in no way that I can discern. I maintain an open mind, and should you ever decide to speak the truth, you could be useful to seekers of truth such as myself. I suspect that it is only your continuous insistence that white is black that keeps the old taunts and jibes fresh in the minds of your jeering audience. Rest assured, you have earned them. Level Head