Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (31811)	2/3/1999 8:59:00 AM
From: JBL	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Daniel, You are not that simple minded. Jordan was not asked once, but 3 times about meeting Lewinsky for a meal, and each time, he swore this never happened. He didn't say "may be", he said "never". This is the breakfast meeting where Lewinsky, who has immunity, claims that Jordan told her to conceal correspondance between her and Clinton. This correspondance was evidence supoenaed by the Jones Lawyer. The Washington Post reports that during his deposition yesterday, Jordan vehemently denied he told Lewinsky to conceal those notes. So, he forgot the breakfast, but remembers exactly what was said during the conversation ? A 3 year old can tell you he was lying on both accounts, and why he was lying. By the way, I know you'll never agree with me, even if I say the earth is round. My answer to you is for the fellows on this thread who do not know they are beeing taken for a ride by a mostly biased media. Again, I suggest that people read both the Washington Post (for the pro Clinton view) and the Wall Street Journal (for arguments for removal). Similarly, compare CNN's presentation of the facts (pro Clinton) to Fox news.