Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : PERFUMANIA.COM . . PRFM . . .FOR LONGS ONLY -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rock_nj who wrote (1992)	2/3/1999 1:24:00 PM
From: Wolff	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 2489

like I said I did not see CNBC so I can only go on reports, but bottomline the CEO placed his son-in-law in a position which he could hurt the company. Whatever family feud occured hurt Shareholder interests. The CEO did not control his company at the most pivotal time. I expect that, I expect CNBC to question it. Did you read Rande's "long walk posts" or other peoples, the execution by the top management and the PR firm are negligent. If CNBC did not in some way reflect this shock and dismay by seasoned and experienced professionals, they would not be in the position of significance they hold. I don't want a CNBC to start a process of Larry King interview with nothing but softballs. The Reuters and others had news saying, Stinky, and Spiral down, if the CEO was not ready and able to attack back well then, he should have not taken the interview, I am sure he had a heads up to the general approach of the interview, something like "we are going to ask you hard questions to what has been happening" I want my CEOs grilled, thats why the get the big bucks