Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (31992)	2/4/1999 12:06:00 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

Daniel, do you think that the President should be able to lie in a civil deposition? Do you think that he should be involved with an intern in the workplace, especially when he is under the kind of scrutiny such a lawsuit entails? Do you think that he should be entitled to smear people (like the "stalker", Monica) and cause them to incur large legal bills (like the hapless Betty Currie) in order to save his own skin? Do you think he has NOT disgraced his office?Why do you keep harping on peripheral matters that are at least as unproven as you claim the obstruction charges are?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (31992)	2/4/1999 2:53:00 AM
From: JBL	Respond to of 67261

<I'm glad you've enjoyed the little "judicial proceeding" set up by Smith, Porter, and Marcus.> You have a keen ability to put words in other people's mouths. < Yes, it's all about "truth and justice", a little like in Singapore, where Lee Kuan Yew gets to sue all his opposition into oblivion.> If Starr were manipulating the Justice system, he would have been fired. Let's just wait and see who leaked Grand Jury Information to the media. <I hope you continue to enjoy your smug moral superiority, too.> Seeing how you treat people who disagree with you on this thread, and the type reasoning you use day after day, I'll take your insult as a compliment.