Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WAVX Anyone? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin who wrote (5394)	2/4/1999 1:48:00 AM
From: Trippi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11417

I leave to go to Lake Tahoe on business for two days -- and come back -- and find a lot of posts -- its good to see all the interest -- Comments: 1. Kevin!!????! (Glad you got back in) 2. Only AMZN goes staight up (and even that's not true anymore. 3. Buy on Weakness -- or at least hold tight. 4. We are just now being discovered 5. Marty -- thanks for the ranking but I should be much lower 6. Can't believe I missed FB's pic 7. Remember I said tidbit before Wall St. Forum and then hopefully bigger news after -- may be a little bit of a wait -- but its on its way. Stock held up strong today. I would have posted earlier if I could but didn't bring a PC with me. Trippi

To: Kevin who wrote (5394)	2/4/1999 6:55:00 AM
From: Marty Lee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11417

They still don't get it. The WAVX call letters are floating across the bottom of CNBC… Somebody's paying more attention. Officially, there are no analysts following WAVX and reporting back to ZACKS. Unofficially, many are doing their homework AND reporting to their institutional investment firms a simpler solution to securing network economic activity; something better than relying upon layers of firewalls and centralized servers. What's happening? What's with this "trusted client" thing? Can't the complexity, security, and constraints of network bandwidth for the entire world be taken care of by IBM servers, software, and INTC chips? Not likely. In the ever increasing xchange of information age, IBM and INTC are just small fish in a big ocean of digital devices that will network the planet just fine with or without them. The NET is Big! Bigger than any one Country - let alone one company. Server functions must be transferred to the personal client devices that will communicate with each other and overlapping networks. WAVX chips enable PC devices to provide a very wide range of security functions, digitally distributed transactions, and protected applications to the Net's converging medium of electronic information xchange gadgetry. WAVX chips will be an essential element to enable the new generation of commercial information xchange that can execute on client-side devices. Wall Street analysts may walk away for a while, but they'll be back as the trusted client system's revenue generating and apportioning potential $$$$$ are attested to by content providers and happy, smiling OEM's down to a fraction of a cent. Move over little e-Bay, Marty

To: Kevin who wrote (5394)	2/4/1999 10:20:00 AM
From: SlateColt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11417

re: 3)X-mass 99 looks undoable to me as the "new chips" won't be ready for testing by the OEM's (a 6 mos process) untill end of 3rd quarter. I must admit I'm a bit frustrated by the ever moving window. The technology is inevitable, but the market will not like this disclosure. I also must confess that I'm engaged to this stock, not married, since I was able to pull out my original investment and still keep 90% of my holdings. I'm a recovering Iomegan, you know. ---Slate