Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : REVERSE SPLITS ! Mad as Hell not Going to Take It -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bob Davis who wrote (212)	2/4/1999 12:03:00 PM
From: campe	Respond to of 217

Bob, the "classic" stockholder revolt that I have experienced has come from CVIA. After a 300:1 RS, shareholders banded together, got a lawyer, and took over. Kicked out a (sleazy) reverse merger candidate and developed a great business plan. KAA, the ringleader, is now the CEO. CVIA went from a BoD of one to a kick butt team focused on getting CVIA of the BB. If you want to interview someone, interview Keith Anderson. Member 4424984 Subject 22765 ragingbull.com

To: Bob Davis who wrote (212)	2/5/1999 12:10:00 AM
From: dennis foster	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217

Bob Try the FAMH thread. Misleading and false pr's,stockholders meeting to vote on RS with the proxies not mailed to shareholders,thread members hiring lawyer .... Subject 18031 I owned the stock at one point. The thread is a very interesting read. Good luck Dennis Foster

To: Bob Davis who wrote (212)	2/5/1999 8:22:00 PM
From: SnakeCharmer	Respond to of 217

Bob... I started this thread out of disgust over the apparent misrepresentation by the BoD of PKGP. They were publishing misleading press releases about how their stock was being shorted and that the shorters would be flushed out by a name change. During the weeks and days before the name change numerous positive press releases were published. One such press release claimed a dividend in the form of "free" warrants as a value added premium for the "faithful" investors. On the night prior to the name change, the company produced a press release announcing a 60:1 rs! They had never even hinted of such an action. I was so angry that evening, that I set up this thread in hopes of starting a revolt against this sort of unfair action, but unfortunately, everyone was divided. S~