SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : ATI Technologies in 1997 (T.ATY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Raymond Duray who wrote (2664)2/4/1999 1:51:00 PM
From: NTT  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5927
 
I didn't follow your link so I'm not sure if they have posted any further information from S3, but from what I know of the Savage4:

-They didn't post any fill rates. This is very important. I would expect it to be at least in line with TNT2 given its timeframe.

-Single pass trilinear, multitexturing, 32MB of memory, no significant hit on 32bpp rendering etc. are all things that the Rage128 already does.

-What do they mean by 2nd generation motion compensation? Motion comp is a very well defined process. I can't think of any enhancements to this other than if they didn't do subpixel accuracy before and have now added this. (This has been there since RagePro)
They still don't do IDCT or have the overlay quality and capabilities of the R128.

-AGP 4x: All the major players will have this ready in the same timeframe.

In short, I didn't see any significant new features. It is definitely not leapfrogging anybody with any new features, and if anything, it seems that it is playing catch up with the Rage128. The only thing it has on top of it is AGP 4x, which ATI will come out with in the same timeframe. The only thing that might skew this picture is if the Savage4 were to have let's say 400-500Mp fill rate or something. This would be absolutely necessary given their timeframe otherwise this part will be obsolete before it's even released.



To: Raymond Duray who wrote (2664)2/4/1999 9:35:00 PM
From: SBHX  Respond to of 5927
 
AGP4x : probably everyone has it by now.

Does anyone know where ATI stands in the development of this next generation of chipset? Is S3 leapfrogging the competition or is ATI moving in synch with this development?

Based on what Intel revealed about AGP4X. I'd be very surprised if players with existing AGP2X solutions don't already have true 4X silicon.

The leap from AGP2x to AGP4x is technically simple compared to PCI to AGP2x.